New British Homes, English planning system, Building Houses in England, Virtual Committees
English Planning System Relaxation
8 May 2021
UK Planning Permissions Policy
1.1 million homes granted planning permission in England in the last decade yet to be built – CPRE response
Commenting on new LGA figures showing 1.1 million homes granted planning permission in England in the last decade are yet to be built, Tom Fyans, campaigns and policy director at CPRE, the countryside charity, said:
‘In the eye of an affordable housing crisis, we need a ‘use it or lose it’ approach to planning permissions to force developers to build homes on land already allocated. Today’s figures are just the latest atop a mountain of evidence that planning permissions and the availability of land are not holding up the delivery of homes – rather it’s the developers slowing down building rates to keep house prices high and maximise their profits.
‘Worse yet, the countryside is central in our response to the climate and nature emergencies and we simply can’t afford to keep releasing more and more land unnecessarily for speculative development. That’s why it’s crucial the government rethinks current proposed changes to planning and uses the upcoming planning bill to push developers into increasing build out rates on existing sites with planning permission. Anything less will only make this bad situation worse.’
5 May 2021
UK Government Scraps Virtual Planning Committees
Architect reacts to government decision to scrap virtual planning committees
Pete Ladhams, Managing Director, Assael Architecture, commented: “The Covid-19 crisis acted as an unlikely catalyst to finally cause change to the UK’s outdated planning system at pace. However, the decision not to extend powers enabling virtual planning committees will be a hugely backwards step.
“Whilst these measures were initially intended to be temporary, the feedback since implemented across the industry was overwhelmingly positive, with many recognising the advantages of a digitised planning process.
“The onus is now on the government to make sure we leverage the momentum created by this pandemic to reform the planning system fully and not miss this opportunity.”
Assael Architecture is an award-winning London-based practice that provides a cohesive suite of architecture, interior design, landscape architecture and visualisation services both in the UK and abroad. They work across a range of sectors, including hospitality, commercial and master planning, and specialise in residentially-led mixed-use schemes.
Assael designs homes across all tenures, from private-for-sale, private-for-rent, including ‘Build to Rent’ through low-cost, shared-equity and social-rented affordable homes. They approach all projects from the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainable design and often integrate uses from the leisure, retail and cultural industries to help deliver thriving communities.
3 August 2020
New UK Housing Delivery
Following housing secretary Robert Jenrick announcing in the Sunday Telegraph that Britain will get a new zonal planning system please find comment from Ken Dytor, founder of Urban Catalyst, the developer behind the £1bn regeneration of Purfleet-on-Thames town centre.
Ken Dytor previously held roles at the Crown Estate, British Land and British Property Federation and was recently appointed to the Thames Estuary Growth Board, which aims to add £115bn to UK GDP annually.
New planning rules risk infrastructure and housing delivery
Ken Dytor, founder and executive chairman of Urban Catalyst, said: “It’s encouraging that the government has put social infrastructure such as schools and hospitals alongside housing in its plans to speed up development.
“While the housing secretary is right the uninspiring design of some developments fuels NIMBYism, concerns over additional pressure on existing public services are typically another major driver behind local opposition to new development.
“Similarly encouraging is the drive to harness greater community participation in the planning process by embracing a more 21st century tech-savvy approach. This should hopefully lead to a wider range of voices being heard, resulting in more inclusive, balanced developments.
“However, if the government’s ‘build build build’ agenda is to align with its ‘levelling up’ promise we need to see regionally driven infrastructure linked to housing delivery to kick start both national and local growth.
“A great example are the strategies focused on unlocking the potential of the Thames Estuary region, such as the Thames Estuary Growth Board’s Green Blue plan and Thames Production Corridor, which seek to marry private and public sector expertise and tap into the growing power of industries such as the artistic, creative and media sectors.”
Comments for this English Planning System article are welcome
21 July 2020
New UK Planning Rules Relaxation
New planning rules risk creating substandard homes on high streets
Following the government’s move to relax permitted development rights and allow retail to residential conversions, please see a comment below from Rory O’Hagan, director at London-based practice Assael Architecture, on why the changes could be detrimental to our high streets and town centres.
Rory has significant expertise in working on converting complicated and constrained sites into mixed-use schemes. Assael’s notable projects include Essential Living’s Union Wharf scheme, Blackhorse Mills with Legal & General, and Pontoon Dock with Grainger and Linkcity.
Rory O’Hagan, director at Assael Architecture, said:
“The government’s relaxation of permitted development rights could do much for the revitalisation of our high streets and town centres. But there must be a cohesive government strategy and clear regulations in place to monitor the standard of homes and ensure it is done well. The need to reinvent the high street shouldn’t just be driven by an urge to reverse the decline of retail or to fast-track housing.
It should be about ensuring that town centres are places where people want to spend time, create new experiences, and live with high-quality, complementary housing. There needs to be a considered drive towards more mixed and blended developments, where retail uses are supported by additional purpose-built homes. By doing this, the onus is on creating desirable, amenity-rich locations with high-quality housing options for all.”
6 July 2020
Is ‘build build build’ best for England’s planning system?
Alister Scott, Professor of Environmental Geography and an expert in urban planning and infrastructure, writes for The Conversation on proposals to change the UK’s planning system.
Is ‘build build build’ really the best way forward for England’s planning system?
“Rip up planning red tape to spur house building,” says housing secretary Robert Jenrick, while Prime Minister Boris Johnson argues for a radical shake-up to the planning system to deliver on his “build build build” mantra. There’s a clear political message that England’s planning system is broken and needs change.
Such change should not be based on simply building more, but on an accurate diagnosis of the problems the planning system is experiencing and trying to solve. If it isn’t, there is a risk of a future prime minister saying again that the planning system is broken and in need of urgent reform.
After all, David Cameron in 2011 attacked the planning system as “the enemy of enterprise” and similarly embarked on a package of reforms to speed up housing delivery and economic growth and cut red tape. Yet consistently over 80% of planning applications are approved, challenging any simplistic presumptions that planning inhibits growth.
Political change has been a constant in England’s planning system. Since the landmark 1947 Town and Country Planning Act, some 360 pieces of planning legislation have been enacted. What’s more, since 1997 there have been 18 housing ministers, hindering policy consistency.
Managing change has been made more difficult with significant cuts to planning departments under austerity, compounded by incremental legislative changes that create the very complexity and delays that the government now complains about.
Today, calls for reform have been fuelled by a report by the right-wing thinktank Policy Exchange. With the country needing to build many more houses, the argument goes that replacing our plan-led system that assesses every application with a zoning system would reduce bureaucracy and help speed up decision-making.
There have already been some moves in this direction, with enterprise zones and brownfield “permission in principle” orders. Permitted development rights have enabled the government to fast-track more commercial-to-residential developments and housing extensions. Boris Johnson has just announced further loosening of the rules on converting other commercial establishments, shops and redundant premises into homes.
But these changes have already been criticised due to the growth of poor quality houses and flats with no windows, isolated from key services and infrastructure. Such homes would never have been given approval in the regular planning system, and also conflict with other policy considerations such as those of the advisory Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission.
Diagnosing the planning challenges
“Build build build” is the wrong starting point. Planning is dominated by a target of building 300,000 homes each year, and the prime minister’s rhetoric reinforces that narrative. But one simple quantity metric on housing is dangerous and limiting when planning encompasses so much more.
The planning system should instead be designed to address the long-term challenges and opportunities our society faces. And that means a more integrated quality-based approach based on a shared vision of the kind of places we want to live in. Let’s identify these challenges in more detail:
- There is a housing challenge. Plenty of luxury flats are built but not enough affordable family homes. The key national priorities do not match the types of housing now being built and wanted by developers.
- There is a climate challenge. We are not doing anything like enough to meet the 1.5℃ Paris target, with 3℃ or more of warming now more likely. The planning system needs to have strong policies that help the transition to a greener lower carbon future with higher priority given to retrofitting of existing housing stock.
- There is a biodiversity challenge. The state of UK nature is declining year on year with many species on the brink of extinction. Biodiversity forms the backbone of viable ecosystems on which we depend on for basic necessities, security and health. This diversity makes us more resilient to change and uncertainty in much the same way as investing in a diverse range of stocks protects a financial portfolio from uncertainty.
- There is a health challenge. Poor housing stock and noise and air pollution, along with a lack of access to key services, all affect physical and mental health.
- There is a poverty and social justice challenge. The gap between the haves and have-nots is widening. Here child poverty is a major issue. The planning system was founded on the need for improved social justice, yet in recent years this has been conspicuously absent from policy.
- There is a public engagement challenge. Ordinary people should be able to understand and engage with planning more effectively and help co-produce the kinds of sustainable places they want to live, work and play in. The current system is too complex and too adversarial. A key opportunity is for the public to be more involved in planning processes which should be based on modern interactive “e-planning” and not dense and static PDF files.
These challenges are all interlinked and collectively should form the key principles on which a better and more joined-up planning system should be built. However, what that planning system looks like is not for me or anyone to dictate in a top-down fashion. We urgently need better diagnoses of these challenges and integrated interventions, so that then we can then design better governance and delivery frameworks that are less complex and fragmented.
I fear that the government will continue on its present trajectory, based on the populist but fallacious presumption that planning is restricting housebuilding, and impose yet more change on a public sector ill-equipped to deal with it. In effect, the country lurches from one crisis to another. And that is definitely not good planning.
This article was originally published by The Conversation.
Northumbria is a research-rich, business-focused, professional university with a global reputation for academic excellence. Find out more about at www.northumbria.ac.uk
Comments for this English Planning System post on e-architect are welcome
English Planning System – Related material
How to design and build better green environments in our towns and cities
May 24, 2019 13:11 BST
The latest edition of the influential journal Town & Country Planning has been edited by a leading Environmental expert from Northumbria University, Newcastle.
How can we put the green back into our urban spaces?
Nov 06, 2017 16:47 GMT
The question of how to encourage city planners and developers to incorporate green spaces and infrastructure in our towns and cities is the subject of a £226,000 research project being run by Northumbria University.
English Planning System: New British Homes image / inforation from Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK, a research-rich, business-focussed, professional university with a global reputation for academic excellence
Previously on e-architect:
UK Housebuilding Policy
UK Architects welcome landmark ARCO Report
New UK Housing – British Housebuilding news
English Planning System Links
UK Housing Links:
English Architecture Designs – chronological list
Contemporary British Homes
Recent British Housing Designs
Fleet Street Hill Housing
Design: Peter Barber Architects
image from architect
Fleet Street Hill Housing
Murray Grove Housing
Stadthaus photo : Will Pryce
Murray Grove Housing
Recent British Home Designs
Black House, Kent, South East England
Architect: AR Design Studio
image courtesy of architects
Black House in Kent
A House for Essex, Essex, South East England
Design: FAT Architecture and Grayson Perry
photograph : Jack Hobhouse
A House for Essex
Balancing Barn, Suffolk, South East England
photo : Living Architecture
Balancing Barn Suffolk
Hurst House, Buckinghamshire, Southern England
Design: John Pardey Architects with Ström Architects
photo : Andy Matthews
Comments / photos for the English Planning System: New British Homes page welcome